![]() ![]() A company that grants a NQO may also have adverse tax consequences if it fails to properly withhold income taxes and pay its share of employment taxes. Under Section 409A, an optionee who is granted a NQO in exchange for services may be subject to immediate income taxation on the “spread” between the exercise price and the fair market value at the end of the year in which the nonqualified stock option vests (and in subsequent years prior to exercise to the extent the underlying stock’s value has increased) and a 20% tax penalty plus interest. Section 409A changed the income tax treatment of nonqualified stock options. 4 Rather, the optionee was taxable on the “spread” between the exercise price and the underlying stock’s fair market value at the time of option exercise. Prior to the enactment of Section 409A, an optionee who was granted a NQO for services was not taxable at the time of grant. To appreciate the significance of Section 409A, it is important to understand the tax treatment of nonqualified stock options both before and after the adoption of Section 409A. In this article, we address, as we did previously, the application of Section 409A to the valuation of the common stock of privately held companies for purposes of setting the exercise prices for compensatory grants of ISOs and NQOs to employees 3 and we update the best practices we have observed, now over the last decade, in stock valuation and option pricing. This is an update of an article we wrote in 2008, a year after the final Section 409A regulations were issued by the IRS. It has been almost 10 years since Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) was enacted. There are a number of significant issues relating to the effect of Section 409A on option terms and on nonqualified deferred compensation more generally that are beyond the scope of this article. The sole focus of this article is the effect of Section 409A on the valuation of the common stock of privately held companies for purposes of setting nonqualified stock option (“NQO”) exercise prices, so that such options are exempt from the application of Section 409A, and - for reasons we explain below – also for purposes of setting the exercise prices of incentive stock options (“ISOs”) although ISOs are not subject to Section 409A. Note that this article is not intended to cover all of the issues under Section 409A. Finally, it describes the best practices we have seen evolve thus far. It then describes the reactions of privately held companies of varying sizes and stages of maturity we have observed - what managements, their boards and their advisors are actually doing on the ground. Next, it describes the valuation rules that were established by the Section 409A guidance issued by the IRS, including the Safe Harbors. This article first briefly describes pre-Section 409A common stock valuation practices - the time-honored appropriate discount method. ![]() In contrast to past practice, the Section 409A regulations (the final version of which was issued by the IRS in 2007) contained detailed guidelines for determining the fair market value of the common stock of a privately held company by requiring a “reasonable application of a reasonable valuation method”, including a few presumptively reasonable valuation methods or “Safe Harbors.” These rules have reshaped private company common stock valuation and option pricing practices. This practice, previously accepted by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS” or the “Service”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), was abruptly ended by the initial Internal Revenue Code Section 409A 1 guidance issued by the IRS in 2005. It was the longstanding practice of privately held companies and their legal and accounting advisors to determine the fair market value of their common stock for purposes of setting option exercise prices by loosely estimating an appropriate discount from the price of recently issued preferred stock on the basis of the company’s stage of development. ![]() Common Stock Valuation and Option Pricing by Private Companies 10 Years of Valuations Under 409A ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |